FX-6330 vs GX-210JA

VS

Primary details

Comparing GX-210JA and FX-6330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1676
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMDno data
Power efficiencyno data2.11
Architecture codenameTemash (2013)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)15 December 2015 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

GX-210JA and FX-6330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads26
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB288 KB
L2 cache1 MB6 MB
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on GX-210JA and FX-6330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3 BGAAM3+
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by GX-210JA and FX-6330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by GX-210JA and FX-6330 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by GX-210JA and FX-6330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by GX-210JA and FX-6330.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

GX-210JA 248
FX-6330 4433
+1688%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 15 December 2015
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 6
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 125 Watt

GX-210JA has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1983.3% lower power consumption.

FX-6330, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

We couldn't decide between GX-210JA and FX-6330. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GX-210JA is a notebook processor while FX-6330 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between GX-210JA and FX-6330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD GX-210JA
GX-210JA
AMD FX-6330
FX-6330

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GX-210JA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 39 votes

Rate FX-6330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about GX-210JA or FX-6330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.