Xeon E-2456 vs FX-9830P

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9830P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.18
Xeon E-2456
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
15.53
+612%

Xeon E-2456 outperforms FX-9830P by a whopping 612% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9830P and Xeon E-2456 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1867469
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data92.83
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency5.6817.70
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$375

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-9830P and Xeon E-2456 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed3 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cache320 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per module)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size250 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9830P and Xeon E-2456 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP4FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9830P and Xeon E-2456. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

FX-9830P and Xeon E-2456 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9830P and Xeon E-2456 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9830P and Xeon E-2456. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9830P and Xeon E-2456.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9830P 2.18
Xeon E-2456 15.53
+612%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-9830P 3332
Xeon E-2456 23770
+613%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.18 15.53
Recency 31 May 2016 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 80 Watt

FX-9830P has 128.6% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2456, on the other hand, has a 612.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

The Xeon E-2456 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9830P in performance tests.

Be aware that FX-9830P is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2456 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9830P and Xeon E-2456, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9830P
FX-9830P
Intel Xeon E-2456
Xeon E-2456

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 113 votes

Rate FX-9830P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2456 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9830P or Xeon E-2456, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.