Core 2 Quad Q9400s vs FX-9830P

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-9830P and Core 2 Quad Q9400s processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1871not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency5.68no data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)18 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-9830P and Core 2 Quad Q9400s basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz0.67 GHz
Bus rateno data1333 MHz
L1 cache320 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per module)6 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size250 mm22x 82 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data76 °C
Number of transistors3,100 million456 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on FX-9830P and Core 2 Quad Q9400s compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP4LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9830P and Core 2 Quad Q9400s. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

FX-9830P and Core 2 Quad Q9400s technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9830P and Core 2 Quad Q9400s are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9830P and Core 2 Quad Q9400s. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9830P and Core 2 Quad Q9400s.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes8no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2016 18 January 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

FX-9830P has an age advantage of 7 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-9830P and Core 2 Quad Q9400s. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FX-9830P is a notebook processor while Core 2 Quad Q9400s is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9830P and Core 2 Quad Q9400s, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9830P
FX-9830P
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400s
Core 2 Quad Q9400s

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 113 votes

Rate FX-9830P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 23 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9400s on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9830P or Core 2 Quad Q9400s, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.