Pentium G4400TE vs FX-9800P

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9800P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.60
+15.9%
Pentium G4400TE
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.38

FX-9800P outperforms Pentium G4400TE by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9800P and Pentium G4400TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20912222
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Pentium
Power efficiency10.093.73
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$64

Detailed specifications

FX-9800P and Pentium G4400TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache320 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per module)512 KB
L3 cacheno data3 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size250 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 million1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on FX-9800P and Pentium G4400TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP4LGA-1151
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9800P and Pentium G4400TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9800P and Pentium G4400TE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9800P and Pentium G4400TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)Intel HD Graphics 510

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9800P and Pentium G4400TE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9800P 1.60
+15.9%
Pentium G4400TE 1.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-9800P 2543
+16.1%
Pentium G4400TE 2190

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.60 1.38
Integrated graphics card 1.95 1.61
Recency 31 May 2016 1 September 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

FX-9800P has a 15.9% higher aggregate performance score, 21.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Pentium G4400TE, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The FX-9800P is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G4400TE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9800P and Pentium G4400TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9800P
FX-9800P
Intel Pentium G4400TE
Pentium G4400TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 44 votes

Rate FX-9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Pentium G4400TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9800P or Pentium G4400TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.