Sempron 3850 vs FX-9590

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9590
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
6.42
+792%
Sempron 3850
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
0.72

FX-9590 outperforms Sempron 3850 by a whopping 792% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9590 and Sempron 3850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10522681
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.762.73
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date6 July 2013 (11 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-9590 and Sempron 3850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed4.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5 GHz1.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache8192 KB2048 KB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size315 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9590 and Sempron 3850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM1
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9590 and Sempron 3850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX++
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9590 and Sempron 3850 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9590 and Sempron 3850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Number of pipelinesno data128
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-9590 and Sempron 3850 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-9590 and Sempron 3850 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9590 and Sempron 3850.

PCIe versionn/a2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9590 6.42
+792%
Sempron 3850 0.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-9590 10194
+786%
Sempron 3850 1150

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-9590 531
+232%
Sempron 3850 160

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-9590 2147
+301%
Sempron 3850 535

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.42 0.72
Recency 6 July 2013 9 April 2014
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 25 Watt

FX-9590 has a 791.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Sempron 3850, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 780% lower power consumption.

The FX-9590 is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 3850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9590 and Sempron 3850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9590
FX-9590
AMD Sempron 3850
Sempron 3850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 940 votes

Rate FX-9590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6 votes

Rate Sempron 3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9590 or Sempron 3850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.