Ryzen 3 2300U vs FX-9590

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9590
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
6.42
+84%
Ryzen 3 2300U
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.49

FX-9590 outperforms Ryzen 3 2300U by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9590 and Ryzen 3 2300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10521529
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency2.7622.02
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date6 July 2013 (11 years ago)26 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-9590 and Ryzen 3 2300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed4.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9590 and Ryzen 3 2300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+FP5
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9590 and Ryzen 3 2300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9590 and Ryzen 3 2300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9590 and Ryzen 3 2300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9590 and Ryzen 3 2300U.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9590 6.42
+84%
Ryzen 3 2300U 3.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-9590 10194
+83.7%
Ryzen 3 2300U 5548

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-9590 531
Ryzen 3 2300U 801
+50.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-9590 2147
Ryzen 3 2300U 2233
+4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.42 3.49
Recency 6 July 2013 26 October 2017
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 15 Watt

FX-9590 has a 84% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 3 2300U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1366.7% lower power consumption.

The FX-9590 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 2300U in performance tests.

Note that FX-9590 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 2300U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9590 and Ryzen 3 2300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9590
FX-9590
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U
Ryzen 3 2300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 939 votes

Rate FX-9590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 193 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9590 or Ryzen 3 2300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.