EPYC 7232P vs FX-9590

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9590
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
6.66

EPYC 7232P outperforms FX-9590 by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9590 and EPYC 7232P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1046690
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.51
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency2.768.81
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date6 July 2013 (11 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$450

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-9590 and EPYC 7232P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed4.7 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplierno data31
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cache8192 KB4 MB
L3 cacheno data32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size315 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9590 and EPYC 7232P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+TR4
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9590 and EPYC 7232P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9590 and EPYC 7232P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9590 and EPYC 7232P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9590 and EPYC 7232P.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9590 6.66
EPYC 7232P 11.59
+74%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-9590 10194
EPYC 7232P 17731
+73.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.66 11.59
Recency 6 July 2013 7 August 2019
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 120 Watt

EPYC 7232P has a 74% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 83.3% lower power consumption.

The EPYC 7232P is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9590 in performance tests.

Note that FX-9590 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7232P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9590 and EPYC 7232P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9590
FX-9590
AMD EPYC 7232P
EPYC 7232P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 934 votes

Rate FX-9590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 125 votes

Rate EPYC 7232P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9590 or EPYC 7232P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.