i5-2580M vs FX-9590
Primary details
Comparing FX-9590 and Core i5-2580M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1050 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i5 |
| Power efficiency | 2.76 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 6 July 2013 (11 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
FX-9590 and Core i5-2580M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 4.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 28 |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | no data | 3 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 149 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 57 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 624 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-9590 and Core i5-2580M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM3+ | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9590 and Core i5-2580M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
FX-9590 and Core i5-2580M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9590 and Core i5-2580M are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9590 and Core i5-2580M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3-1333 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9590 and Core i5-2580M.
| PCIe version | n/a | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 35 Watt |
FX-9590 has 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
i5-2580M, on the other hand, has 528.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between FX-9590 and Core i5-2580M. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-9590 is a desktop processor while Core i5-2580M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9590 and Core i5-2580M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
