Core 2 Duo T9600 vs FX-9590

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9590
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
6.42
+844%
Core 2 Duo T9600
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.68

FX-9590 outperforms Core 2 Duo T9600 by a whopping 844% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9590 and Core 2 Duo T9600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10522727
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency2.761.84
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date6 July 2013 (11 years ago)15 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$316

Detailed specifications

FX-9590 and Core 2 Duo T9600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed4.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L2 cache8192 KB6 MB
L3 cacheno data6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.2125V

Compatibility

Information on FX-9590 and Core 2 Duo T9600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+BGA479,BGA956,PBGA479,PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9590 and Core 2 Duo T9600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

FX-9590 and Core 2 Duo T9600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9590 and Core 2 Duo T9600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9590 and Core 2 Duo T9600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9590 and Core 2 Duo T9600.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9590 6.42
+844%
Core 2 Duo T9600 0.68

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-9590 10194
+848%
Core 2 Duo T9600 1075

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-9590 531
+67.5%
Core 2 Duo T9600 317

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-9590 2147
+317%
Core 2 Duo T9600 515

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.42 0.68
Recency 6 July 2013 15 July 2008
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 35 Watt

FX-9590 has a 844.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo T9600, on the other hand, has 528.6% lower power consumption.

The FX-9590 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T9600 in performance tests.

Note that FX-9590 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Duo T9600 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9590 and Core 2 Duo T9600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9590
FX-9590
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600
Core 2 Duo T9600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 940 votes

Rate FX-9590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 172 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9590 or Core 2 Duo T9600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.