Xeon Bronze 3408U vs FX-9370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9370
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
3.94
Xeon Bronze 3408U
2023
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
6.02
+52.8%

Xeon Bronze 3408U outperforms FX-9370 by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9370 and Xeon Bronze 3408U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14331093
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data27.58
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.694.56
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date6 July 2013 (11 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$425

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-9370 and Xeon Bronze 3408U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed4.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz1.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data22.5 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature57 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9370 and Xeon Bronze 3408U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9370 and Xeon Bronze 3408U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

FX-9370 and Xeon Bronze 3408U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9370 and Xeon Bronze 3408U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9370 and Xeon Bronze 3408U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4000
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9370 and Xeon Bronze 3408U.

PCIe versionn/a4.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9370 3.94
Xeon Bronze 3408U 6.02
+52.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-9370 6255
Xeon Bronze 3408U 9557
+52.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.94 6.02
Recency 6 July 2013 10 January 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon Bronze 3408U has a 52.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and 76% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Bronze 3408U is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9370 in performance tests.

Note that FX-9370 is a desktop processor while Xeon Bronze 3408U is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9370 and Xeon Bronze 3408U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9370
FX-9370
Intel Xeon Bronze 3408U
Xeon Bronze 3408U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 159 votes

Rate FX-9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate Xeon Bronze 3408U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9370 or Xeon Bronze 3408U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.