A4-5145M vs FX-9370

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-9370 and A4-5145M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1433not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency1.69no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date6 July 2013 (11 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-9370 and A4-5145M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed4.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9370 and A4-5145M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FP2
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9370 and A4-5145M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9370 and A4-5145M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9370 and A4-5145M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8310G (424 - 554 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9370 and A4-5145M.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 July 2013 1 June 2013
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 17 Watt

FX-9370 has an age advantage of 1 month, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

A4-5145M, on the other hand, has 1194.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-9370 and A4-5145M. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-9370 is a desktop processor while A4-5145M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9370 and A4-5145M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9370
FX-9370
AMD A4-5145M
A4-5145M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 159 votes

Rate FX-9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate A4-5145M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9370 or A4-5145M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.