FX-770K vs FX-8800P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8800P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.83
FX-770K
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.96
+7.1%

FX-770K outperforms FX-8800P by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8800P and FX-770K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20101951
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Carrizono data
Power efficiency11.332.80
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)December 2014 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8800P and FX-770K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cacheno data256K
L2 cache2048 KB4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size250 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors3,100 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on FX-8800P and FX-770K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP4FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8800P and FX-770K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8800P and FX-770K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8800P and FX-770K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3-2133
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-8800P and FX-770K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-8800P and FX-770K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8800P and FX-770K.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8800P 1.83
FX-770K 1.96
+7.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8800P 2851
FX-770K 3060
+7.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.83 1.96
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

FX-8800P has 333.3% lower power consumption.

FX-770K, on the other hand, has a 7.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FX-8800P and FX-770K.

Be aware that FX-8800P is a notebook processor while FX-770K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8800P and FX-770K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8800P
FX-8800P
AMD FX-770K
FX-770K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 102 votes

Rate FX-8800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 7 votes

Rate FX-770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8800P or FX-770K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.