Atom x7809C vs FX-8800P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8800P and Atom x7809C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1981not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Carrizono data
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Amston Lake (2024)
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)8 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8800P and Atom x7809C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB (per module)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8800P and Atom x7809C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP4Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8800P and Atom x7809C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8800P and Atom x7809C are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8800P and Atom x7809C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4, DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-8800P and Atom x7809C integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-8800P and Atom x7809C integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8800P and Atom x7809C.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes89

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 June 2015 8 April 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

FX-8800P has 66.7% lower power consumption.

Atom x7809C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FX-8800P and Atom x7809C. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8800P and Atom x7809C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8800P
FX-8800P
Intel Atom x7809C
Atom x7809C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 102 votes

Rate FX-8800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x7809C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8800P or Atom x7809C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.