EPYC 7313 vs FX-8350

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8350
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.88
EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
25.54
+558%

EPYC 7313 outperforms FX-8350 by a whopping 558% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8350 and EPYC 7313 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1472200
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.7816.30
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD FX-Series (Desktop)AMD EPYC
Power efficiency2.8315.03
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$1,083

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7313 has 1990% better value for money than FX-8350.

Detailed specifications

FX-8350 and EPYC 7313 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads832
Base clock speed4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data30
L1 cacheno data1 MB
L2 cache8192 KB8 MB
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm+
Die size315 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8350 and EPYC 7313 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3+SP3
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8350 and EPYC 7313. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8350 and EPYC 7313 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8350 and EPYC 7313. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8350 and EPYC 7313.

PCIe versionn/a4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8350 3.88
EPYC 7313 25.54
+558%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8350 5936
EPYC 7313 39091
+559%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8350 488
EPYC 7313 1487
+205%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8350 1988
EPYC 7313 11432
+475%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.88 25.54
Recency 23 October 2012 12 January 2021
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 8 32
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 155 Watt

FX-8350 has 24% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7313, on the other hand, has a 558.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7313 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8350 in performance tests.

Note that FX-8350 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7313 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8350 and EPYC 7313, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8350
FX-8350
AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3670 votes

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 31 vote

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8350 or EPYC 7313, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.