Celeron 6205 vs FX-8350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8350 and Celeron 6205 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1475not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.77no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD FX-Series (Desktop)Intel Tiger Lake
Power efficiency2.83no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Tiger Lake U (2020)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8350 and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2/2 GHz
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cache8192 KB2.5 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8350 and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+BGA1499
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8350 and Celeron 6205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1no data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8350 and Celeron 6205 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8350 and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8350 and Celeron 6205.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 1 September 2020
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 15 Watt

FX-8350 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron 6205, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-8350 and Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8350 is a desktop processor while Celeron 6205 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8350 and Celeron 6205, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8350
FX-8350
Intel Celeron 6205
Celeron 6205

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3676 votes

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 6205 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8350 or Celeron 6205, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.