Atom Z500 vs FX-8350

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8350 and Atom Z500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1471not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.81no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD FX-Series (Desktop)Intel Atom
Power efficiency2.83no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$45

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8350 and Atom Z500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz0.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data400 MT/s
Multiplierno data8
L1 cacheno data56 KB
L2 cache8192 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm224.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data
VID voltage rangeno data0.80 -1.1V

Compatibility

Information on FX-8350 and Atom Z500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+PBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt0.65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8350 and Atom Z500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

FX-8350 and Atom Z500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8350 and Atom Z500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8350 and Atom Z500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8350 and Atom Z500.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

FX-8350 8.34
+1279%
Atom Z500 115

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 2 April 2008
Physical cores 8 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

FX-8350 has an age advantage of 4 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FX-8350 and Atom Z500. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8350 is a desktop processor while Atom Z500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8350 and Atom Z500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8350
FX-8350
Intel Atom Z500
Atom Z500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 3661 vote

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 28 votes

Rate Atom Z500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8350 or Atom Z500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.