Atom C3308 vs FX-8350
Primary details
Comparing FX-8350 and Atom C3308 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1475 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.76 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Series | AMD FX-Series (Desktop) | Intel Atom |
Power efficiency | 2.83 | no data |
Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
Release date | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 15 August 2017 (7 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $32 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
FX-8350 and Atom C3308 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 4 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Multiplier | no data | 16 |
L1 cache | no data | 112 KB |
L2 cache | 8192 KB | 4 MB |
L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 61 °C | 89 °C |
Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-8350 and Atom C3308 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | AM3+ | FCBGA1310 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 9.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8350 and Atom C3308. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
QuickAssist | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Security technologies
FX-8350 and Atom C3308 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Boot | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
SGX | no data | - |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8350 and Atom C3308 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8350 and Atom C3308. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4: 1866 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 14.936 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8350 and Atom C3308.
PCIe version | n/a | 3 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 6 |
USB revision | no data | 3 |
Total number of SATA ports | no data | 6 |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 6 |
Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
Integrated LAN | no data | 4x2.5/1 GBE |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 23 October 2012 | 15 August 2017 |
Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 9 Watt |
FX-8350 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Atom C3308, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1288.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between FX-8350 and Atom C3308. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-8350 is a desktop processor while Atom C3308 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8350 and Atom C3308, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.