Xeon E5-2430L v2 vs FX-8320E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8320E
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.12
Xeon E5-2430L v2
2014
6 cores / 12 threads, 60 Watt
3.90
+25%

Xeon E5-2430L v2 outperforms FX-8320E by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320E and Xeon E5-2430L v2 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16151443
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.79no data
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency3.116.15
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)no data
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)1 January 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$147no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8320E and Xeon E5-2430L v2 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rateno data7.2 GT/s
L2 cache8192 KBno data
L3 cacheno data15 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C69 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320E and Xeon E5-2430L v2 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3+FCLGA1356
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt60 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320E and Xeon E5-2430L v2. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

FX-8320E and Xeon E5-2430L v2 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320E and Xeon E5-2430L v2 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320E and Xeon E5-2430L v2. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory sizeno data384 GB
Max memory channelsno data3
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.4 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320E and Xeon E5-2430L v2.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data24

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8320E 3.12
Xeon E5-2430L v2 3.90
+25%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8320E 4960
Xeon E5-2430L v2 6190
+24.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.12 3.90
Recency 2 September 2014 1 January 2014
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 60 Watt

FX-8320E has an age advantage of 8 months, and 33.3% more physical cores.

Xeon E5-2430L v2, on the other hand, has a 25% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more threads, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 58.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E5-2430L v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8320E in performance tests.

Note that FX-8320E is a desktop processor while Xeon E5-2430L v2 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320E and Xeon E5-2430L v2, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320E
FX-8320E
Intel Xeon E5-2430L v2
Xeon E5-2430L v2

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1108 votes

Rate FX-8320E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon E5-2430L v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320E or Xeon E5-2430L v2, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.