Ryzen Threadripper 1955X vs FX-8320E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320E and Ryzen Threadripper 1955X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1587not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8320E and Ryzen Threadripper 1955X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads8no data
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data32768 KB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320E and Ryzen Threadripper 1955X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+SP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320E and Ryzen Threadripper 1955X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320E and Ryzen Threadripper 1955X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320E and Ryzen Threadripper 1955X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320E and Ryzen Threadripper 1955X.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 8 10
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

FX-8320E has 31.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 1955X, on the other hand, has 25% more physical cores, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FX-8320E and Ryzen Threadripper 1955X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320E and Ryzen Threadripper 1955X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320E
FX-8320E
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1955X
Ryzen Threadripper 1955X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1079 votes

Rate FX-8320E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1955X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320E or Ryzen Threadripper 1955X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.