Xeon Gold 6134M vs FX-8320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320 and Xeon Gold 6134M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1549not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency2.60no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)25 April 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,217

Detailed specifications

FX-8320 and Xeon Gold 6134M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data32
L1 cacheno data512 KB
L2 cache8192 KB8 MB
L3 cacheno data24.75 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °C79 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320 and Xeon Gold 6134M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration14 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM3+FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Xeon Gold 6134M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

FX-8320 and Xeon Gold 6134M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Xeon Gold 6134M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Xeon Gold 6134M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data1.5 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data128.001 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Xeon Gold 6134M.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 25 April 2017
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 130 Watt

FX-8320 has 4% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6134M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FX-8320 and Xeon Gold 6134M. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8320 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6134M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320 and Xeon Gold 6134M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320
FX-8320
Intel Xeon Gold 6134M
Xeon Gold 6134M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1389 votes

Rate FX-8320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Gold 6134M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320 or Xeon Gold 6134M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.