Xeon E-2414 vs FX-8320

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320 and Xeon E-2414 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1548not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.59no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$225

Detailed specifications

FX-8320 and Xeon E-2414 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size315 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320 and Xeon E-2414 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Xeon E-2414. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

FX-8320 and Xeon E-2414 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Xeon E-2414 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Xeon E-2414. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Xeon E-2414.

PCIe versionn/a5
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 14 December 2023
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 55 Watt

FX-8320 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Xeon E-2414, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and 127.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-8320 and Xeon E-2414. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8320 is a desktop processor while Xeon E-2414 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320 and Xeon E-2414, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320
FX-8320
Intel Xeon E-2414
Xeon E-2414

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1387 votes

Rate FX-8320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2414 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320 or Xeon E-2414, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.