Ryzen 4700S vs FX-8320
Primary details
Comparing FX-8320 and Ryzen 4700S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1549 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 2.60 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | Cardinal (2021) |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 26 June 2021 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $399 |
Detailed specifications
FX-8320 and Ryzen 4700S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 308 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 61 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 10,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-8320 and Ryzen 4700S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3+ | AMD BGA 2197 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen 4700S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen 4700S are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen 4700S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | unknown Depends on motherboard |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Ryzen 4700S.
| PCIe version | n/a | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 October 2012 | 26 June 2021 |
| Threads | 8 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen 4700S has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between FX-8320 and Ryzen 4700S. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320 and Ryzen 4700S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
