V-Series V140 vs FX-8300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8300
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.36
+1144%
V-Series V140
2010
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.27

FX-8300 outperforms V-Series V140 by a whopping 1144% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8300 and V-Series V140 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15643125
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD V-Series
Power efficiency3.351.02
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)4 October 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8300 and V-Series V140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rateno data3200 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache8192 KB512 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8300 and V-Series V140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+S1
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8300 and V-Series V140. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8300 and V-Series V140 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8300 and V-Series V140. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8300 and V-Series V140.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.36 0.27
Recency 23 October 2012 4 October 2010
Physical cores 8 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 25 Watt

FX-8300 has a 1144.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

V-Series V140, on the other hand, has 280% lower power consumption.

The FX-8300 is our recommended choice as it beats the V-Series V140 in performance tests.

Note that FX-8300 is a desktop processor while V-Series V140 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8300 and V-Series V140, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8300
FX-8300
AMD V-Series V140
V-Series V140

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2362 votes

Rate FX-8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 37 votes

Rate V-Series V140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8300 or V-Series V140, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.