Core 2 Duo P7450 vs FX-8300

Primary details

Comparing FX-8300 and Core 2 Duo P7450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1562not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency3.34no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8300 and Core 2 Duo P7450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.13 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L2 cache8192 KB3 MB
L3 cacheno data3 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.15V

Compatibility

Information on FX-8300 and Core 2 Duo P7450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+BGA479,BGA956,PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8300 and Core 2 Duo P7450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

FX-8300 and Core 2 Duo P7450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8300 and Core 2 Duo P7450 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8300 and Core 2 Duo P7450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8300 and Core 2 Duo P7450.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8300 5340
+582%
Core 2 Duo P7450 783

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8300 457
+75.8%
Core 2 Duo P7450 260

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8300 1718
+288%
Core 2 Duo P7450 443

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 1 January 2009
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 25 Watt

FX-8300 has an age advantage of 3 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo P7450, on the other hand, has 280% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-8300 and Core 2 Duo P7450. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8300 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Duo P7450 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8300 and Core 2 Duo P7450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8300
FX-8300
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
Core 2 Duo P7450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2358 votes

Rate FX-8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 14 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P7450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8300 or Core 2 Duo P7450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.