Athlon PRO 300GE vs FX-8300

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8300
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.49
+24.2%

FX-8300 outperforms Athlon PRO 300GE by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8300 and Athlon PRO 300GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15571690
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon
Power efficiency3.357.32
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)30 September 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8300 and Athlon PRO 300GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplierno data34
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size315 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8300 and Athlon PRO 300GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+Socket AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8300 and Athlon PRO 300GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8300 and Athlon PRO 300GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8300 and Athlon PRO 300GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8300 and Athlon PRO 300GE.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8300 3.49
+24.2%
Athlon PRO 300GE 2.81

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8300 5335
+23.8%
Athlon PRO 300GE 4308

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8300 455
Athlon PRO 300GE 938
+106%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8300 1716
Athlon PRO 300GE 1912
+11.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.49 2.81
Recency 23 October 2012 30 September 2019
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

FX-8300 has a 24.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Athlon PRO 300GE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

The FX-8300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon PRO 300GE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8300 and Athlon PRO 300GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8300
FX-8300
AMD Athlon PRO 300GE
Athlon PRO 300GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2340 votes

Rate FX-8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 113 votes

Rate Athlon PRO 300GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8300 or Athlon PRO 300GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.