Athlon 64 FX-74 vs FX-8300

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8300
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.36
+451%
Athlon 64 FX-74
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 125 Watt
0.61

FX-8300 outperforms Athlon 64 FX-74 by a whopping 451% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8300 and Athlon 64 FX-74 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15622782
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.13
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.350.46
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)November 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$500

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8300 and Athlon 64 FX-74 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size315 mm2235 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8300 and Athlon 64 FX-74 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+F
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8300 and Athlon 64 FX-74. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8300 and Athlon 64 FX-74 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8300 and Athlon 64 FX-74. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8300 and Athlon 64 FX-74.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8300 3.36
+451%
Athlon 64 FX-74 0.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8300 5340
+449%
Athlon 64 FX-74 972

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.36 0.61
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 125 Watt

FX-8300 has a 450.8% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 31.6% lower power consumption.

The FX-8300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 FX-74 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8300 and Athlon 64 FX-74, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8300
FX-8300
AMD Athlon 64 FX-74
Athlon 64 FX-74

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 2358 votes

Rate FX-8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-74 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8300 or Athlon 64 FX-74, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.