Xeon Gold 6334 vs FX-8170
Primary details
Comparing FX-8170 and Xeon Gold 6334 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 546 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Power efficiency | no data | 7.77 |
Architecture codename | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
Release date | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
FX-8170 and Xeon Gold 6334 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 18 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 69 °C |
Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on FX-8170 and Xeon Gold 6334 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
Socket | AM3+ | FCLGA4189 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8170 and Xeon Gold 6334. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
FX-8170 and Xeon Gold 6334 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8170 and Xeon Gold 6334 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8170 and Xeon Gold 6334. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-3200 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TB |
Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8170 and Xeon Gold 6334.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 23 October 2012 | 6 April 2021 |
Threads | 8 | 16 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 165 Watt |
FX-8170 has 32% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6334, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between FX-8170 and Xeon Gold 6334. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-8170 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6334 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8170 and Xeon Gold 6334, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.