Ryzen 9 4900H vs FX-8120

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8120
2011
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
4.23
Ryzen 9 4900H
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
12.29
+191%

Ryzen 9 4900H outperforms FX-8120 by a whopping 191% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8120 and Ryzen 9 4900H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1381634
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)
Power efficiency3.1425.35
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)16 March 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8120 and Ryzen 9 4900H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.4 GHz
Multiplierno data33
L1 cache384 KB512 KB
L2 cache8192 KB4 MB
L3 cache8192 KB8 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size315 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.0125 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8120 and Ryzen 9 4900H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FP6
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8120 and Ryzen 9 4900H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA, SHA
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8120 and Ryzen 9 4900H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8120 and Ryzen 9 4900H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data68.27 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8120 and Ryzen 9 4900H.

PCIe versionn/a3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8120 4.23
Ryzen 9 4900H 12.29
+191%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8120 6594
Ryzen 9 4900H 19150
+190%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8120 411
Ryzen 9 4900H 1549
+277%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8120 1523
Ryzen 9 4900H 6736
+342%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.23 12.29
Recency 12 October 2011 16 March 2020
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 9 4900H has a 190.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 177.8% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 4900H is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8120 in performance tests.

Note that FX-8120 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 9 4900H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8120 and Ryzen 9 4900H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8120
FX-8120
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
Ryzen 9 4900H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 956 votes

Rate FX-8120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 239 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 4900H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8120 or Ryzen 9 4900H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.