Ryzen 5 7535HS vs FX-8100

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8100
2011
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.55
Ryzen 5 7535HS
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 35 Watt
11.59
+355%

Ryzen 5 7535HS outperforms FX-8100 by a whopping 355% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8100 and Ryzen 5 7535HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1736668
Place by popularitynot in top-10024
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency2.5431.34
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Rembrandt-R (2023)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8100 and Ryzen 5 7535HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads812
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.55 GHz
L1 cache384 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm6 nm
Die size315 mm2208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-8100 and Ryzen 5 7535HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FP7
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8100 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8100 and Ryzen 5 7535HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8100 and Ryzen 5 7535HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 660M ( - 1900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8100 and Ryzen 5 7535HS.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8100 2.55
Ryzen 5 7535HS 11.59
+355%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8100 4055
Ryzen 5 7535HS 18408
+354%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8100 411
Ryzen 5 7535HS 1761
+328%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8100 1819
Ryzen 5 7535HS 6947
+282%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.55 11.59
Recency 12 October 2011 4 January 2023
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 8 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

FX-8100 has 33.3% more physical cores.

Ryzen 5 7535HS, on the other hand, has a 354.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 50% more threads, a 433.3% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 7535HS is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8100 in performance tests.

Note that FX-8100 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 7535HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8100 and Ryzen 5 7535HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8100
FX-8100
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
Ryzen 5 7535HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 64 votes

Rate FX-8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1419 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7535HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8100 or Ryzen 5 7535HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.