Celeron 787 vs FX-8100
Primary details
Comparing FX-8100 and Celeron 787 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1731 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
Power efficiency | 2.54 | no data |
Architecture codename | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
Release date | 12 October 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 July 2011 (13 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
FX-8100 and Celeron 787 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
Bus rate | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 13 |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 8 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 1.5 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 315 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 504 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on FX-8100 and Celeron 787 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | AM3+ | FCBGA1023 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8100 and Celeron 787. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | + | + |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
FDI | no data | + |
Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
Security technologies
FX-8100 and Celeron 787 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8100 and Celeron 787 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | - |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8100 and Celeron 787. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 950 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of FX-8100 and Celeron 787 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
SDVO | no data | + |
CRT | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8100 and Celeron 787.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 12 October 2011 | 1 July 2011 |
Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
Threads | 8 | 1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 17 Watt |
FX-8100 has an age advantage of 3 months, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
Celeron 787, on the other hand, has 458.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between FX-8100 and Celeron 787. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-8100 is a desktop processor while Celeron 787 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8100 and Celeron 787, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.