A10-6700T vs FX-770K

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-770K
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.00
+33.3%

FX-770K outperforms A10-6700T by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-770K and A10-6700T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19482167
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.813.04
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Richland (2013−2014)
Release dateDecember 2014 (9 years ago)16 September 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-770K and A10-6700T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache256K192 KB
L2 cache4 MB4096 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size245 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C71 °C
Number of transistors2,411 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-770K and A10-6700T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FM2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-770K and A10-6700T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX+AVX
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-770K and A10-6700T are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-770K and A10-6700T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3-1866
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon™ HD 8650D
Number of pipelinesno data384
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-770K and A10-6700T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-770K and A10-6700T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-770K and A10-6700T.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-770K 2.00
+33.3%
A10-6700T 1.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-770K 3060
+33.1%
A10-6700T 2299

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.00 1.50
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

FX-770K has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

A10-6700T, on the other hand, has 44.4% lower power consumption.

The FX-770K is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-6700T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-770K and A10-6700T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-770K
FX-770K
AMD A10-6700T
A10-6700T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 7 votes

Rate FX-770K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 13 votes

Rate A10-6700T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-770K or A10-6700T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.