Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs FX-7600P

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-7600P
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.63
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
16.77
+929%

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS outperforms FX-7600P by a whopping 929% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-7600P and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2081386
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Kaverino data
Power efficiency4.4156.68
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Hawk Point (2024)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-7600P and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateBGA (FP3)no data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size245 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,410 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on FX-7600P and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP3FP7
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-7600P and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-7600P and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-7600P and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon 780M
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-7600P and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-7600P and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-7600P and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-7600P 1.63
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS 16.77
+929%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-7600P 2582
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS 26644
+932%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.63 16.77
Recency 4 June 2014 16 April 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a 928.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-7600P in performance tests.

Be aware that FX-7600P is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-7600P and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-7600P
FX-7600P
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 11 votes

Rate FX-7600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 11 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-7600P or Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.