Ultra 9 285T vs FX-7600P

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-7600P and Core Ultra 9 285T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2077not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Kaverino data
Power efficiency4.41no data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

FX-7600P and Core Ultra 9 285T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus rateBGA (FP3)no data
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm3 nm
Die size245 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,410 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on FX-7600P and Core Ultra 9 285T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP31851
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-7600P and Core Ultra 9 285T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

FX-7600P and Core Ultra 9 285T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-7600P and Core Ultra 9 285T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-7600P and Core Ultra 9 285T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-7600P and Core Ultra 9 285T integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-7600P and Core Ultra 9 285T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-7600P and Core Ultra 9 285T.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes820

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm

Ultra 9 285T has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 833.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FX-7600P and Core Ultra 9 285T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FX-7600P is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 9 285T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-7600P and Core Ultra 9 285T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-7600P
FX-7600P
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T
Core Ultra 9 285T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 11 votes

Rate FX-7600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 9 285T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-7600P or Core Ultra 9 285T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.