A6-8500P vs FX-7600P

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-7600P
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.63
+79.1%
A6-8500P
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.91

FX-7600P outperforms A6-8500P by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-7600P and A6-8500P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20812525
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriAMD Carrizo
Power efficiency4.415.74
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-7600P and A6-8500P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
Bus rateBGA (FP3)no data
L2 cache4096 KB1024 KB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size245 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistors2,410 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on FX-7600P and A6-8500P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP3FP4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-7600P and A6-8500P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAHSA 1.0
AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX+AVX
FRTC++
FreeSync-+
TrueAudio++
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management++
VirusProtect++
HSA++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-7600P and A6-8500P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-7600P and A6-8500P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133Not Listed
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core count84
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-7600P and A6-8500P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-7600P and A6-8500P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 12
Vulkan++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-7600P and A6-8500P.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-7600P 1.63
+79.1%
A6-8500P 0.91

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-7600P 2582
+78.7%
A6-8500P 1445

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.63 0.91
Recency 4 June 2014 3 June 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

FX-7600P has a 79.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A6-8500P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The FX-7600P is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-8500P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-7600P and A6-8500P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-7600P
FX-7600P
AMD A6-8500P
A6-8500P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 11 votes

Rate FX-7600P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate A6-8500P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-7600P or A6-8500P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.