Xeon X7560 vs FX-6350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6350
2013
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.89
Xeon X7560
2010
8 cores / 16 threads, 130 Watt
5.11
+76.8%

Xeon X7560 outperforms FX-6350 by an impressive 77% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6350 and Xeon X7560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16581203
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.193.72
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)no data
Release date29 April 2013 (11 years ago)1 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6350 and Xeon X7560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads616
Base clock speed3.9 GHz2.27 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.67 GHz
L2 cache6144 KBno data
L3 cacheno data24 MB L3 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.25 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6350 and Xeon X7560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+FCBGA1567,FCLGA1567
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6350 and Xeon X7560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Security technologies

FX-6350 and Xeon X7560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6350 and Xeon X7560 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6350 and Xeon X7560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6350 and Xeon X7560.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6350 2.89
Xeon X7560 5.11
+76.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6350 4587
Xeon X7560 8110
+76.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.89 5.11
Recency 29 April 2013 1 January 2010
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 6 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 130 Watt

FX-6350 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 4% lower power consumption.

Xeon X7560, on the other hand, has a 76.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

The Xeon X7560 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6350 in performance tests.

Note that FX-6350 is a desktop processor while Xeon X7560 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6350 and Xeon X7560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6350
FX-6350
Intel Xeon X7560
Xeon X7560

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 368 votes

Rate FX-6350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 13 votes

Rate Xeon X7560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6350 or Xeon X7560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.