Opteron X2 275 vs FX-6350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-6350 and Opteron X2 275 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1655not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.19no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Italy (2005−2006)
Release date29 April 2013 (11 years ago)May 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6350 and Opteron X2 275 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed3.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache6144 KB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million233 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.25 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6350 and Opteron X2 275 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3+940
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6350 and Opteron X2 275. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6350 and Opteron X2 275 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6350 and Opteron X2 275. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6350 and Opteron X2 275.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 95 Watt

FX-6350 has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron X2 275, on the other hand, has 31.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-6350 and Opteron X2 275. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-6350 is a desktop processor while Opteron X2 275 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6350 and Opteron X2 275, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6350
FX-6350
AMD Opteron X2 275
Opteron X2 275

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 367 votes

Rate FX-6350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron X2 275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6350 or Opteron X2 275, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.