E-350 vs FX-6350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-6350 and E-350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1660not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency2.19no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date29 April 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6350 and E-350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed3.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache6144 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size315 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.25 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6350 and E-350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FT1
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6350 and E-350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6350 and E-350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6350 and E-350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon HD 6310

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6350 and E-350.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6350 4588
+990%
E-350 421

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-6350 482
+355%
E-350 106

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-6350 1525
+738%
E-350 182

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 April 2013 4 January 2011
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 18 Watt

FX-6350 has an age advantage of 2 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

E-350, on the other hand, has 594.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-6350 and E-350. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-6350 is a desktop processor while E-350 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6350 and E-350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6350
FX-6350
AMD E-350
E-350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 372 votes

Rate FX-6350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 386 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6350 or E-350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.