Phenom II X4 945 (95W) vs FX-6330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-6330 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1687not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.11no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Deneb (2009−2011)
Release date15 December 2015 (9 years ago)22 July 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6330 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache288 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm2258 mm2
Number of transistors1,200 million758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on FX-6330 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM3
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6330 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6330 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6330 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6330 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W).

PCIe version2.02.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 December 2015 22 July 2009
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 95 Watt

FX-6330 has an age advantage of 6 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Phenom II X4 945 (95W), on the other hand, has 31.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-6330 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6330 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6330
FX-6330
AMD Phenom II X4 945 (95W)
Phenom II X4 945 (95W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 39 votes

Rate FX-6330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 723 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 945 (95W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6330 or Phenom II X4 945 (95W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.