Ryzen 3 8300G vs FX-6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6300
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.60
Ryzen 3 8300G
2024
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
9.01
+247%

Ryzen 3 8300G outperforms FX-6300 by a whopping 247% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and Ryzen 3 8300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1731854
Place by popularity58not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.6432.47
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.5913.11
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Phoenix2 (2024)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$132$176

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 8300G has 4973% better value for money than FX-6300.

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and Ryzen 3 8300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads68
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache288 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache6144 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size315 mm2137 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million20,900 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and Ryzen 3 8300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM5
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Ryzen 3 8300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Ryzen 3 8300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Ryzen 3 8300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Ryzen 3 8300G.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data14

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6300 2.60
Ryzen 3 8300G 9.01
+247%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6300 4137
Ryzen 3 8300G 14316
+246%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.60 9.01
Recency 23 October 2012 8 January 2024
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

FX-6300 has 50% more physical cores.

Ryzen 3 8300G, on the other hand, has a 246.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 33.3% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 8300G is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and Ryzen 3 8300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6300
FX-6300
AMD Ryzen 3 8300G
Ryzen 3 8300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4188 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 8300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6300 or Ryzen 3 8300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.