i3-2115C vs FX-6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and Core i3-2115C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1716not rated
Place by popularity66not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.52no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.59no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)1 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$132no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and Core i3-2115C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache288 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache6144 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB3072 KB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and Core i3-2115C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+1155
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Core i3-2115C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Core i3-2115C are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Core i3-2115C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel HD 3000

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Core i3-2115C.

PCIe version3.03.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 1 May 2012
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 4
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

FX-6300 has an age advantage of 5 months, and 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

i3-2115C, on the other hand, has 46.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-6300 and Core i3-2115C. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and Core i3-2115C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6300
FX-6300
Intel Core i3-2115C
Core i3-2115C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4097 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Core i3-2115C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6300 or Core i3-2115C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.