Core 2 Extreme QX9650 vs FX-6300

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1732not rated
Place by popularity58not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.64no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.59no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)November 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$132no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3 GHz
Bus rateno data1333 MHz
L1 cache288 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache6144 KB12 MB (shared)
L3 cache8192 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm22x 107 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data64 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million820 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

FX-6300 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650.

PCIe version3.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 130 Watt

FX-6300 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 36.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-6300 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and Core 2 Extreme QX9650, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6300
FX-6300
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Core 2 Extreme QX9650

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4204 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 124 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6300 or Core 2 Extreme QX9650, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.