Celeron M 550 vs FX-6300

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6300
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.60
+797%
Celeron M 550
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.29

FX-6300 outperforms Celeron M 550 by a whopping 797% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and Celeron M 550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17163109
Place by popularity66not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.60no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiency2.590.91
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$132no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and Celeron M 550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads61
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache288 KBno data
L2 cache6144 KBno data
L3 cache8192 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and Celeron M 550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Celeron M 550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Celeron M 550 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Celeron M 550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Celeron M 550.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6300 2.60
+797%
Celeron M 550 0.29

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6300 4137
+790%
Celeron M 550 465

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.60 0.29
Physical cores 6 1
Threads 6 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 30 Watt

FX-6300 has a 796.6% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 550, on the other hand, has 216.7% lower power consumption.

The FX-6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 550 in performance tests.

Note that FX-6300 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 550 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and Celeron M 550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6300
FX-6300
Intel Celeron M 550
Celeron M 550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4102 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 28 votes

Rate Celeron M 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6300 or Celeron M 550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.