Athlon II X3 450 vs FX-6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6300
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.60
+122%
Athlon II X3 450
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 95 Watt
1.17

FX-6300 outperforms Athlon II X3 450 by a whopping 122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and Athlon II X3 450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17312374
Place by popularity58not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.644.89
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.591.16
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Rana (2009−2011)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)21 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$132$45

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon II X3 450 has 664% better value for money than FX-6300.

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and Athlon II X3 450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads63
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache288 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache6144 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm2169 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million300 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and Athlon II X3 450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Athlon II X3 450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Athlon II X3 450 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Athlon II X3 450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Athlon II X3 450.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6300 2.60
+122%
Athlon II X3 450 1.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6300 4137
+123%
Athlon II X3 450 1858

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-6300 456
+50%
Athlon II X3 450 304

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-6300 1431
+91.1%
Athlon II X3 450 749

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

FX-6300 4900
+43.7%
Athlon II X3 450 3410

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.60 1.17
Recency 23 October 2012 21 September 2010
Physical cores 6 3
Threads 6 3
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

FX-6300 has a 122.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The FX-6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X3 450 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and Athlon II X3 450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6300
FX-6300
AMD Athlon II X3 450
Athlon II X3 450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4188 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 289 votes

Rate Athlon II X3 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6300 or Athlon II X3 450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.