Xeon X3480 vs FX-6200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6200
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.67
+24.8%

FX-6200 outperforms Xeon X3480 by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6200 and Xeon X3480 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17211884
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.952.05
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)no data
Release date27 February 2012 (12 years ago)1 April 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6200 and Xeon X3480 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads68
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.06 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.73 GHz
L1 cache288 KBno data
L2 cache6144 KBno data
L3 cache8192 KB8 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °C73 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6200 and Xeon X3480 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6200 and Xeon X3480. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data36 Bit

Security technologies

FX-6200 and Xeon X3480 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6200 and Xeon X3480 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6200 and Xeon X3480. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6200 and Xeon X3480.

PCIe versionn/a2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6200 2.67
+24.8%
Xeon X3480 2.14

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6200 4085
+24.8%
Xeon X3480 3273

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.67 2.14
Recency 27 February 2012 1 April 2010
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 95 Watt

FX-6200 has a 24.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon X3480, on the other hand, has 33.3% more threads, and 31.6% lower power consumption.

The FX-6200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3480 in performance tests.

Note that FX-6200 is a desktop processor while Xeon X3480 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6200 and Xeon X3480, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6200
FX-6200
Intel Xeon X3480
Xeon X3480

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 133 votes

Rate FX-6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 142 votes

Rate Xeon X3480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6200 or Xeon X3480, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.