Celeron M 560 vs FX-6200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-6200 and Celeron M 560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1698not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron M
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date27 February 2012 (12 years ago)1 May 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6200 and Celeron M 560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads61
Base clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz2.13 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache288 KB64 KB
L2 cache6144 KB1 MB
L3 cache8192 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size315 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6200 and Celeron M 560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6200 and Celeron M 560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6200 and Celeron M 560 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6200 and Celeron M 560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6200 and Celeron M 560.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6200 4106
+667%
Celeron M 560 535

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 February 2012 1 May 2008
Physical cores 6 1
Threads 6 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 30 Watt

FX-6200 has an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 560, on the other hand, has 316.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-6200 and Celeron M 560. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-6200 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 560 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6200 and Celeron M 560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6200
FX-6200
Intel Celeron M 560
Celeron M 560

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 132 votes

Rate FX-6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 42 votes

Rate Celeron M 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6200 or Celeron M 560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.