Athlon 64 3000+ vs FX-6200

Place in the ranking	1745	3218
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Power efficiency	1.94	0.22
Architecture codename	Zambezi (2011−2012)	Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date	27 February 2012 (12 years ago)	January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$65

Detailed specifications

FX-6200 and Athlon 64 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	6	1
Base clock speed	3.8 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	4.1 GHz	2 GHz
L1 cache	288 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	6144 KB	512K
L3 cache	8192 KB	0 KB
Chip lithography	32 nm	130 nm
Die size	315 mm²	193 mm²
Maximum core temperature	61 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,200 million	154 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	+	-
P0 Vcore voltage	Min: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 V	no data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6200 and Athlon 64 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	AM3+	754
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6200 and Athlon 64 3000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	-
FMA	+	-
AVX	+	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6200 and Athlon 64 3000+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6200 and Athlon 64 3000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6200 and Athlon 64 3000+.

PCIe version

n/a

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6200 2.57
+1124%

Athlon 64 3000+ 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6200 4075
+1120%

Athlon 64 3000+ 334

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.57	0.21
Physical cores	6	1
Threads	6	1
Chip lithography	32 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	125 Watt	89 Watt

FX-6200 has a 1123.8% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 3000+, on the other hand, has 40.4% lower power consumption.

The FX-6200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 3000+ in performance tests.

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6200 and Athlon 64 3000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.