EPYC 7773X vs FX-6130

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6130
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.74
EPYC 7773X
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
57.60
+2002%

EPYC 7773X outperforms FX-6130 by a whopping 2002% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6130 and EPYC 7773X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking169222
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.7319.47
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Milan-X (2022)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6130 and EPYC 7773X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads6128
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache288 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size315 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors1,200 million33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-6130 and EPYC 7773X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3+SP3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6130 and EPYC 7773X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6130 and EPYC 7773X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6130 and EPYC 7773X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6130 and EPYC 7773X.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6130 2.74
EPYC 7773X 57.60
+2002%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6130 4353
EPYC 7773X 91491
+2002%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.74 57.60
Recency 23 October 2012 22 March 2022
Physical cores 6 64
Threads 6 128
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 280 Watt

FX-6130 has 194.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7773X, on the other hand, has a 2002.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 966.7% more physical cores and 2033.3% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7773X is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6130 in performance tests.

Note that FX-6130 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7773X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6130 and EPYC 7773X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6130
FX-6130
AMD EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 13 votes

Rate FX-6130 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7773X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6130 or EPYC 7773X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.