Processor N95 vs FX-6120

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6120
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.54
Processor N95
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.27
+28.7%

Processor N95 outperforms FX-6120 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6120 and Processor N95 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17501606
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency2.4419.88
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6120 and Processor N95 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.6 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache288 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-6120 and Processor N95 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6120 and Processor N95. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

FX-6120 and Processor N95 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6120 and Processor N95 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6120 and Processor N95. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6120 and Processor N95.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.54 3.27
Recency 23 October 2012 3 January 2023
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

FX-6120 has 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Processor N95, on the other hand, has a 28.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

The Processor N95 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6120 in performance tests.

Note that FX-6120 is a desktop processor while Processor N95 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6120 and Processor N95, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6120
FX-6120
Intel Processor N95
Processor N95

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 34 votes

Rate FX-6120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 676 votes

Rate Processor N95 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6120 or Processor N95, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.