Ryzen 3 8300G vs FX-6100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-6100 and Ryzen 3 8300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1794not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.32no data
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Phoenix2 (2024)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$176

Detailed specifications

FX-6100 and Ryzen 3 8300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads68
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache288 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size315 mm2137 mm2
Number of transistors1,200 million20,900 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-6100 and Ryzen 3 8300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM5
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6100 and Ryzen 3 8300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6100 and Ryzen 3 8300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6100 and Ryzen 3 8300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6100 and Ryzen 3 8300G.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data14

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2011 8 January 2024
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

FX-6100 has 50% more physical cores.

Ryzen 3 8300G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 33.3% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-6100 and Ryzen 3 8300G. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6100 and Ryzen 3 8300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6100
FX-6100
AMD Ryzen 3 8300G
Ryzen 3 8300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1093 votes

Rate FX-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 8300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6100 or Ryzen 3 8300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.