EPYC 7473X vs FX-6100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6100
2011
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.41
EPYC 7473X
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 240 Watt
38.74
+1507%

EPYC 7473X outperforms FX-6100 by a whopping 1507% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6100 and EPYC 7473X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking179185
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.3114.72
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Milan-X (2022)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6100 and EPYC 7473X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads648
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache288 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size315 mm28x 81 mm2
Number of transistors1,200 million33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-6100 and EPYC 7473X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3+SP3
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6100 and EPYC 7473X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6100 and EPYC 7473X are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6100 and EPYC 7473X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6100 and EPYC 7473X.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6100 2.41
EPYC 7473X 38.74
+1507%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6100 3687
EPYC 7473X 59280
+1508%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.41 38.74
Recency 12 October 2011 22 March 2022
Physical cores 6 24
Threads 6 48
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 240 Watt

FX-6100 has 152.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7473X, on the other hand, has a 1507.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7473X is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6100 in performance tests.

Note that FX-6100 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7473X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6100 and EPYC 7473X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6100
FX-6100
AMD EPYC 7473X
EPYC 7473X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1092 votes

Rate FX-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7473X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6100 or EPYC 7473X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.